Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Two Thumbs Down For Thumbs Up Program

I might lose some people with this rant, but I have to comment on an article in the OWH yesterday about the new Thumbs Up program started here in Omaha that is intended to “encourage Omahans to give police and firefighters a ‘thumbs-up’ as an expression of their gratitude and support.” One thing I have never understood is this worship of police and firefighters. Police and firemen are not all selfless human beings, sacrificing for the common good. The truth is that for most of these men in uniform their occupation is just that, a job. A good friend of mine is a cop, and his primary motivation for becoming a cop was the simple fact that he couldn’t see himself working in an office 8 hours a day. He certainly did not become a cop to be a hero, or to give service to the community. He viewed it as a solid career that fit his personality and actually paid quite well. Heck, he actually makes more than I do and more than most of my college educated friends as well. (My cop friend also has a college degree. I’m just pointing out that these friends I’m comparing him to aren’t bums). So it’s hard to see where he’s making such a grand sacrifice for the rest of us to the point where we need to thank him. We already do a pretty good job thanking these men and women with our hard-earned tax dollars.

In fact it is ironic that in this city, where we are forced to pay a special restaurant tax to make up for a huge shortfall of the police and fire pension fund, that local citizens would have the desire to go above and beyond to show gratitude to our police and firefighters. Remember, that shortfall exists because of the pervasive pension spiking that occurred for years that allowed police officers to retire with exorbitant pensions. If anything they should be thanking us for this windfall they reaped at our expense.

Another point I want to address is this idea that cops and firefighters have such dangerous jobs and that is why we should be so grateful for what they do. This article by Radley Balko, Senior Writer for Huffington Post, addresses this misconception. He points out that a law enforcement career is not “among the top ten most dangerous professions, falling well behind logging, fishing, driving a cab, trash collecting, farming and trucking.” (Note that firefighting did not make the top ten either.) Trash collecting is also vital to any community, and yet when do you ever hear about the danger garbage men face everyday? Of course if a garbage man gets killed on the job it doesn’t receive nearly the same amount of media attention that a cop getting killed does. Now I’m not saying that police and firefighters don’t have dangerous jobs, and those who actually have sacrificed their lives for others deserve all of the praise in the world. I just want to point out that most police and firefighters will in fact never have to make that sacrifice and actually do so less than many other professions.

One last point I want to make is this, in most collective groups of people there are always good and bad actors. You could be giving a thumps-up to a David Kofoed who is committing fraud to put innocent people in jail, for all you know. So my advice is this, if a cop or firefighter personally does a great job assisting you in his duties, especially if he seemingly goes above and beyond his duties, by all means shower him or her with praise and expressions of gratitude, but don’t shower with praise every cop you ever run into. You have no way of knowing whether he deserves it or not. If you still feel the need to do that, then I ask that the next time you see your local garbage man, give him a thumbs up as well.

5 comments:

  1. Sorry to say but your blog needs some fact checking.

    First off, saying the pension shortfall exists because of spiking is a half truth at best. The Bates Commission found that only 8% of the shortfall could be attributed to spiking.

    http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/45450577.html

    Furthermore, the pension fund was already seeing a significant shortfall in 2005, just about a year after the contracts that allowed spiking were approved.

    http://www.ketv.com/r/4871766/detail.html

    While the spiking issue has certainly contributed to the shortfall, it is a very small amount. 92% of the shortfall is for reasons other than spiking.

    As far as David Kofoed goes, he has no place in this article. He was NOT a law enforcement officer. He was a forensic/crime scene investigators.

    ReplyDelete
  2. you sir, could stand to take a ride-along with a police officer and post this story again. Police are berated and abused by the people they interact with on a daily basis in a way unparalleled by any other occupation. A little support should not be scoffed at.

    your Huffpost story is also a sad attempt to diminish the contributions of police officers. It says, "take away traffic accidents and its not bad at all" well, there's a bit of a newsflash in here, those traffic accidents happen to cops on the job, out there trying to keep you safe from impaired drivers. Officers don't have to be in a shootout to be risking their lives for the public. Last time I checked, most folks don't do their job hanging out in a lane of 60 mph traffic just for laughs.

    Its laughable that you really have a problem with people supporting their local police force with something as simple as a thumbs-up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Okay, I can admit when I’m wrong about certain things and the way I worded that passage about the pension spiking was misleading because pension spiking is not solely responsible for the pension shortfall, but really my overriding point was that cops have, through legitimate and less than legitimate means, pushed up their salaries and pensions to excessive degrees, which runs counter to this strange concept that all cops are self-interested, noble heroes and we should be thanking them just for being cops. Though how ironic it is that in a comment questioning my facts Eric states a fact of his own of dubious authenticity. This article I found a while back claims pension spiking began in the 1970s and the OWH began reporting it in the 1980s, so I don’t know where the year 2005 came from.

    http://www.dealsomaha.com/article/20110118/NEWS01/701189934/0

    As far as Kofoed is concerned, I was trying to point out a local figure related to the law enforcement community to make a larger point that not all cops are good people, just like not all accountants, teachers, priests, politicians, etc. are good people. Giving a thumbs-up to some random person on the street who just so happens to be wearing a badge makes about as much sense as treating every sports figure as role model. It’s simple-minded. So I stand by the point I made in the last paragraph of my post.

    As far as the comment from Kevin Gibbs, that “Huffpost story” is not in any way discrediting the risk a cop takes while operating a motor vehicle, he was pointing out that fact to make a completely unrelated point. And once again I am not denying that cops have stressful and comparatively dangerous jobs, I just happen to believe their current level of remuneration more than adequately compensates for that. I don't feel I need to do anything to show my thanks to cops or firefighters other than continue to pay my taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The one thing I think should be mentioned about the pension spiking is that our politicians failed to stop it, and as you say, it's been going on since at the least 1970s. So ultimately I have a hard time blaming the police officers as it was something that was systematic. Our politicians needed to put a stop to it and of course they failed, as they typically do in these negotiations. I'd love to think that the officers guilty of spiking would realize that this was something that ultimately screwed over future police retirees and the taxpayers they serve, but there's only so many Frank Serpico-types out there.

    As far as taking a greater risk operating a motor vehicle, how does this make them any different than say a UPS driver, a truck driver, or a courier? I certainly don't want to belittle what a typical police officer does on a daily basis, but I agree that mindlessly saluting them is ridiculous and support the general points made by the article.

    Lastly, did Kofoed not work his way up either in the Sheriff's office or another agency to his role in CSI? I don't really know, but if so, then that sounds like an argument over semantics. I don't see any problem with the statement as written, but I'm not one for splitting hairs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kudos to Leo for admitting that the passage was misleading. I respect that.

    As for that OWH article, my response to that is "where are the sources"? Anyone can claim that something was reported on, but why not list the dates or stories where that actually happened? Or better yet, why not quote passages of the contracts that supposedly allowed pension spiking? Since they failed to do that, I have no way of verifying that what they say is correct.

    Regardless, I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that Matt and Maggie are using a twisted definition of pension spiking, which would make sense seeing as how even the city AND the police/fire unions agree that it was the 2003/2004 contracts that started the practice. I don't want to speak for Matt and Maggie but I believe they are labeling those years as spiking because of the "overtime, comp time and several other types of pay" that factored into pensions. That is NOT spiking. Spiking is the act of acquiring as much overtime and specialty pay as possible in the last year of employment to artificially raise your pension payout. That was a perk given in the 03/04 contracts. Prior to that, and what we have gone back to, is basing pension payouts on multiple years of employment rather than one.

    As for Kofoed, I understand the point you were trying to make. It's a valid point, but IMO a little cheap to put to a guy who was not a cop as your example. There are actual examples of bad cops that you could have used, including the Omaha cop who was arrested about a year ago or so for enticing an underage girl over the internet.

    ReplyDelete